Sunday, 20 July 2014

What's it Like, Being a Student Journalist?


This is a small, slightly less-than-serious piece I was asked to write about my experience as News Editor this year, as part of Concourse's 50th Anniversary celebrations. 

(If you picked up a hard copy at Graduation, you'll have read a version of this. However, it's not available online for some reason, and I also think the editing hasn't really done my piece justice. This version is slightly longer, but also much clearer.) 

As you read, Concourse began looking for sub-editors at the start of the year. I think it's fair to say that I 
was chomping at the bit for a piece of the action. I bloody love current affairs, me.

The most fun I've had this year has been the SU Elections. As some of you may have seen, I presented the live ConcourseTV coverage with Paul Sayers, and later took on the task of live-tweeting the election results (@News_Concourse for those interested). It was challenging, but great experience of live reporting. I also had the privilege of working with KUBE on our joint coverage of Varsity 2014. Live match reporting, post-game interviews with coaches and players, and a "roving reporter" style segment quizzing Staffs students on their (heavily drunken, pre-lunch) experiences was all great fun, and a great insight into the life of sports reporters. Never again will I laugh at a reporter being sworn at by a drunken fan whilst on air. Well, okay, maybe I'll still laugh a bit, but with the personal knowledge of how he or she feels!

At times there has been a shortage of communicable events and stories to write about, but through investigating wider global affairs such as the Ukraine Crisis on our KUBE Radio show, we have been able to combat this. Again, with writers investigating and reporting huge stories like the Accommodation Shortage whilst I was stuck in the depths of the archives of the Poetry Foundation, researching for my dissertation, we have been really successful this year!

Hopefully through our work with the University Marketing department this year, future News Editors will have a rich source of ongoing affairs to report on and write about.

Writing about and communicating all the exciting and important things happening at Keele has been a great pleasure, and being able to edit and help others write about news has been a privilege!


Who knows, it might even help me get a job! #EmployMePlease? 

Blowing the Bubble: When Concourse Took to the Airwaves


This is one of the final pieces I wrote for Concourse, during my time as Student and News Editor at Keele University!

There's a few editorial mistakes, but seeing as this edition was the first for the new team, we'll forgive them I think!


http://www.concourseonline.com/patricvk/concourse-and-kube-join-forces/

Saturday, 21 June 2014

Why Right? Local Protest on a Global scale.

Recently, the Republican's Second-in-Command in the House of Representatives, Eric Cantor was ousted from his seemingly safe position as GOP candidate for the congressional seat in Richmond, VA. The victor? Not a Democrat, that's for sure.

David Brat is in fact an almost wholly unknown entity. Yet, this economics professor's Tea Party conservatism and meagre $300,000 campaign fund was enough to defeat even Cantor, an experienced Congressman, often seen as to the right of the GOP himself, and with a reported war chest of over $5million.

So why did this, in the words of Jamelle Bouie, "one of the biggest upsets...ever", occur? Well, a simple reason can be put down to the economy, stupid. But it's more complex than simply the money question. Brat explained himself that although the loss of free market principles by Washington Republicans was worrisome, Cantor's support (however small-scale) for the rights of immigrants was far more so. However, whatever the specific battlegrounds on the Hill may be, this was a battle fought and lost in Richmond. And it was a battle of conservatism.

Brat's overriding position remains that Cantor simply wasn't as Conservative as he, and therefore should not represent the GOP in this upcoming Mid-Term cycle.

As worrying as this might seem, and looking at Cantor's record  it is worrying, it is not a surprising. Actually, it's part of a world-wide trend that is quickly becoming the political story of 2014.

In the recent European Parliament Elections, the Right took swathes of seats across Western Europe. Most focused on by the British media was of course our very own UKIP, and the French La Front National, headed by the charming Ms Le Pen. In Greece, even more troublesome events occurred as the infamous Golden Dawn party not only won seats, but were seen parading their virulent Nazism. It's fair to say that the Neo-Nazi movement in Eastern Europe has been visible in the past decade, but such a pompous display of "SS Songs and Anti-Semitism" is still shocking from a party  actually winning in elections.

Again, the question must be asked; Why?

Why, in 2014 are these parties gaining popularity? Well, just as Mr Cantor found out to his distress, the economy is always on the table. The Greeks know that better than most, as was reflected by the victories had by anti-austerity parties of all political persuasions. But if the Left (and far-Left, at that) also won in Greece, surely that means the economy cannot be the reason to vote Right wing.

Another popular rationalisation of this swing to the right, is the idea that the public wish to punish their political representatives. However, that is again hard to believe, at least entirely. If British voters are currently leading towards voting Labour at next year's General Election, and wanted to punish the current government, surely their protest vote would have been more evenly spread between Labour and the Greens? Instead, UKIP gained hugely in Europe, whilst the other parties lost or at least stagnated. At least part of this can be explained as a protest not solely against the sitting government, but against the entire 'political class'.

In addition, it seems clear that just as David Brat had the beating of Eric Cantor, due to an apparent soft line on immigration, Farage, Le Pen, and from his prison cell, Nikos Michaloliakos, won the hearts of the European electorate by promising tighter immigration controls. We've seen a knee-jerk reaction from the major political parties as a result, with even Ed Milliband calling for tougher controls than previously. All of this, in the weeks leading up to Refugee Week, a celebration of the roles of migrants in our society.

This fear of immigration obviously has dark undertones, and as Nigel Farage denies all racism we are reminded of the shouts of Golden Dawn, and even closer to home, the history of the Le Pen family and leadership of La Front National. The long time leader, Jean-Marie Le Pen was prosecuted under the Gayssot Act in 1987, the law which makes Holocaust denial a criminal offence in France, amongst other convictions.

However, this shift towards anti-immigration, and arguably racist policies, is not limited to Europe or even America. The election of Narendra Modi to the office of Indian Prime Minister exemplifies the continuity of the world-wide shift to the Right.

Modi is not only the perfect example of Indian society, being pulled up by his own boot-straps, from tea-seller to Prime Minister. He is also leader of the BJP, the political wing of the Hindu Nationalist Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. The group which has been banned three times since Indian independence, once due to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi by one of their number.

Most notoriously, Modi was the premier of the Gujarat Province in 2002. The year of the deadly anti-Muslim riots, in which both he and  the Police were held responsible by some human rights organisations, and sections of the media. It has even been described as a pogrom by some.

Of course, Modi's actions and affiliations do not suggest an anti-immigration tactic on his behalf, but a parallel can perhaps be found in the fear of groups outside of the majority, represented by Muslims in Gujarat and immigrants in Europe and the United States.

Another important factor in the Indian elections was the economy. As in Europe and the States, the rate of growth is contentious, and economic policy is scrutinised heavily. Unlike the incumbent party, Modi promised not subsidy, but conservative, trickle-down economics. Somewhat amazingly, this policy gained popularity for Modi in many sections of society, including the Muslim population. Bill Clinton, Narendra Modi, even John Oliver has posited it, perhaps it truly is all about the economy.

However, the course of the stagnant economy and concerns over the movement of people do not necessarily result in a swing to the right. In fact, criticism over the truthfulness of the European election results as a barometer for public opinion are absolutely valid. With a turnout of little over 30%, it can certainly be argued that UKIP do not actually hold the support they claim to. Labour will have to make significant advances if they wish to prove this at the General Election, and as the teachers say, bums on seats will have to be the carrion call. Surely this will be echoed across Europe, and throughout congressional districts and states with Senate seats up for grabs at this year's quickly approaching US Midterms, as political parties globally attempt to reverse the swing of early 2014.


N.B.  On Saturday 21st of June, there will be a National Demonstration against Austerity in London. Starting at Portland Place (outside BBC Headquarters) at 1pm, and marching to Parliament Sq to hear speeches from Russell Brand, Owen Jones and representatives of many Trade Unions, including Len McCluskey.  

Wednesday, 11 June 2014

Four Gripping Speeches and a Fifteen Minute Voting Window...


What follows is an article written on the second day of the National Union of Students' National Conference. Due to errors made and final year workloads at Keele, it was never published by Concourse. However, though it may not be directly relevant any longer, I'm publishing it here to show the work done under pressure and time restraints whilst covering the Conference, which was not only thoroughly enjoyable, but a fantastic opportunity to experience live political reporting.



 Four Gripping Speeches and a Fifteen Minute Voting Window...

Where are we?

NUS National Conference, voting for the next National President, of course!

On the 2nd day of Conference, the floor heard four speeches, one from each of the Presidential candidates, as their final act before the ballot commenced. The ACC had been awash with campaign materials, such as T-Shirts and enthusiastic supporters, representing each of the candidates, but this was their last opportunity to sway the undecided and cement the votes of the converted.

None of the speeches were surprising. After months of campaigning, and innumerate leaflets and manifestos handed out, most people in the Liverpool ACA knew what was coming. But these speeches still gripped the thousand delegates, and many more observers, on Conference floor.

 Jack Duffin argued fluently that recent changes to the school system has meant that many people who don’t “need” to go to Uni, do so. He also argued for a return to the grammar school system nationwide. Whilst it is well-known that Duffin was running with the backing of UKIP, which has been a source of much debate, this was barely mentioned in his speech.  However, controversy was not entirely skirted by Duffin, and a small number of delegates decided to show their displeasure at his aims and intentions by staging a walk-out during his speech.

Aaron Kiely, the 2013-14 Black Student's Representative on the NEC (National Executive Council), ran on an anti-Austerity, anti-cuts, and anti-Racism platform. He was supported by Labour Students, and this party-political strain to his campaign came across strongly, and he pointed out the many faults he indentified in the Tory-Lib Dem Coalition government. He was a vocal figure throughout Conference, and this did not change during his speech. His voice was often raised, and reached fever-pitch when discussing his call for solidarity with Palestine. This point was supplemented by his wearing of a Keffiyah during his speech.

The third candidate to take the rostrum was Daniel Lemberger-Cooper. He was previously a member of Royal Holloway Union, and has been heavily involved in action on campuses across the capital this year as President of the University of London Union. Again, he ran on an anti-cuts and anti-austerity platform, though through his more militant approach and strong oration, came across as a more realistically radical candidate than any of the others. Cooper was supported by the Green Party. He described himself as a militant Trade Unionist, which seemed to garner cheers and jeers in equal measure.

Finally, the incumbent candidate, Toni Pearce, took the stage. Pearce stood out, not only as the current NUS President, but as the only female-identifying candidate (for this position) in a Conference shaped by the rhetoric of Women in Leadership, for which Pearce is at least partially responsible. Pearce is perhaps the only one of these candidates who could hold a candle to the oration skills of Cooper, and as she had already shown this with her Opening remarks a day earlier, it was no surprise that she earned a standing ovation for her five-minute summary of her year in the role, and promises for the next twelve months. 

After these speeches, which all merited the applause they received, the delegates were instructed to assign the candidates a mark of one to four based on preference (the NUS uses the same voting system, STV, as KeeleSU), on their ballot papers, and file out of the conference hall doors to deposit their papers. The remaining occupants were then instructed to leave, the doors were locked, and a tense fifteen minutes ensued as all the votes were counted.

Once delegates returned, the main business of the conference continued, until the Elections Committee interrupted in order to announce the outcome.

In a landslide victory, Toni Pearce was re-elected as President of the NUS. She beat her nearest competitor Aaron Kiely by 304 votes. Third place was Daniel Cooper, with Jack Duffin coming in last with only 18 votes. RON had 16 votes.

What IS Refugee Week?


Refugee Week has come to Keele University for the first time, we've had a Open Mic Night, and now we're heading swiftly to the main event, a week long photographic exhibition.

But what IS Refugee Week?

Click the link below to read my article for Concourse, answering that very question!


http://www.concourseonline.com/but-what-is-refugee-week/

Friday, 25 April 2014

An Apology



As you may have noticed, I haven't published anything on this site for a while, and today came a flurry of new posts to read!

That is due to the fact that I have recently finished writing my Dissertation for my American Studies degree. Understandably (I hope), this means I have been very busy, and haven't had the time to update the blog. However, that's now done, and gone! So I can get back to keeping LSO up to date.

Sorry for the delay on these articles. I hope they're still worth reading, despite being a tad late if you didn't see them on ConcourseOnline.

Cheers!

P.

KeeleSU President to Step Down

This is a news report written this week, due to the news that Vic Taylor, who recently won re-election as KeeleSU President, has decided to step down from her role, at the end of this semester.

http://www.concourseonline.com/keelesu-president-to-step-down/